From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44743: native-comp: confirm-exit-emacs warns about active processes when compiling Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:05:48 +0200 Message-ID: <83pn0nqpf7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y2iwz2eq.fsf@gnu.org> <87eekj8a4t.fsf@gnus.org> <83pn42u5fz.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20273"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, stefan@marxist.se, 44743@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 26 08:07:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lFXDV-0005Bg-Jb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:07:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34026 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFXDU-0004Zf-Lt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:07:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFXDK-0004Ti-Te for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFXDK-0004J8-Jq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFXDK-00029D-Do for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:07:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44743 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44743-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44743.16143231778201 (code B ref 44743); Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44743) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2021 07:06:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40151 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFXCa-00028D-SD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:06:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40570) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFXCX-00027t-9q for 44743@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:06:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43078) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFXCQ-0003kb-T7; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:06:07 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1881 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lFXCL-0003Yl-J9; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 02:06:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Thu, 25 Feb 2021 22:51:00 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200833 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: Stefan Kangas , Eli Zaretskii , > Lars > Ingebrigtsen , 44743@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 22:51:00 +0000 > > IIUC this bug is "just" about deciding what's the best default behavior > regarding requiring confirmation or not for killing running async > compile processes when exiting Emacs. Yes, mostly. > As my understanding is that Eli's preference is matching the current > implementation (requiring it) I'm wondering if we can close this bug. It is fine with me to close the bug and leave this for later, when the branch is merged, and we have more user experience. We could reopen the bug at that time. A better solution, from my POV, given the controversy, is to provide a defcustom for this, and then I'm okay with making silently killing the compilation the default. I thought it would leave everyone happy. For some reason, Lars and Stefan are against even that, so I hesitate to even ask you, Andrea, to add such a defcustom if you have time.