From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46911: 28.0.50; woman default page to open Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 23:25:41 +0200 Message-ID: <83pn0ezk4q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <7hpn0fdd32.fsf@dahud.boetes.org> <87a6rivg41.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9441"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46911@debbugs.gnu.org, han@boetes.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 04 22:29:27 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lHvXD-0002Nb-1i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 22:29:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47468 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHvXC-0004XQ-3l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:29:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44682) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHvUu-0002pE-7C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:27:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48954) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHvUs-0002bu-KP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:27:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHvUs-0008Rr-H2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:27:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 21:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46911 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 46911-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46911.161489317032406 (code B ref 46911); Thu, 04 Mar 2021 21:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2021 21:26:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60500 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHvU2-0008Qc-4j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:26:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54802) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHvTz-0008QO-Rk for 46911@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:26:08 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHvTu-00024Y-3n; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:26:02 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3155 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lHvTq-0007VP-QY; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:26:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87a6rivg41.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 04 Mar 2021 21:06:06 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201477 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 21:06:06 +0100 > Cc: 46911@debbugs.gnu.org > > I think this is how `M-x woman' has always worked -- instead of typing > in a section and a word (as you do with `M-x man'), you use a file > browser to choose the manual. > > There are advantages and disadvantages to both methods (for instance, in > `M-x man' you aren't notified that there's a page for the topic in > several sections), but the `M-x woman' method (sometimes) more choosing. > > So I think everything here works as designed? Anybody got an opinion > here? Yes, I think this is a kind-of feature of woman.el.