From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47125: 28.0.50; pdumper assumes compile time page size remains valid Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:16:36 +0300 Message-ID: <83pmzjmexn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83r1kigut8.fsf@gnu.org> <90eb70a9-e482-3c08-9f14-8b813bdf0042@dancol.org> <87v99bp9ha.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8410"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 47125@debbugs.gnu.org, pipcet@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 28 18:17:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lQY69-00025E-L1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 18:17:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48278 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQY68-0003Qt-32 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 12:17:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59172) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQY62-0003Qn-Iy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 12:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35313) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQY62-0003D2-BV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 12:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQY62-0000ef-5m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 12:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 16:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47125 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 47125-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47125.16169481982483 (code B ref 47125); Sun, 28 Mar 2021 16:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47125) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2021 16:16:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46859 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQY5e-0000dy-3Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 12:16:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37878) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lQY5c-0000dj-Ke for 47125@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 12:16:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54948) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lQY5W-0002xj-F5; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 12:16:30 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4604 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lQY5V-0002SI-Aj; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 12:16:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87v99bp9ha.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 28 Mar 2021 17:46:09 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203187 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Daniel Colascione , Eli Zaretskii , > 47125@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 17:46:09 +0200 > > This was two weeks ago, and there was no followup here. Everybody > seemed to agree that we should use 64K here... So is the following > patch correct? Yes, I think so.