From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51180: M-x emacs-lisp-byte-compile-and-load Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:25:02 +0300 Message-ID: <83pms6kdoh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v921f9lv.fsf@miha-pc> <87v9216tix.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24866"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 51180@debbugs.gnu.org, miha@kamnitnik.top To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 15 08:26:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGfW-0006IF-On for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 08:26:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37018 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGfV-0001XJ-Dc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:26:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58730) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGfL-0001So-PH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:26:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54530) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGfK-0005LY-AX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:26:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGfK-0006xG-6i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51180 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 51180-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51180.163427915226704 (code B ref 51180); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51180) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2021 06:25:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37841 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGf9-0006wd-UC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:25:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56822) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGf7-0006wP-8q for 51180@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:25:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49338) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGf1-00056B-Ew; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:25:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4201 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mbGeO-0007F3-NT; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:25:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Richard Stallman on Thu, 14 Oct 2021 18:22:26 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:217282 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 18:22:26 -0400 > Cc: 51180@debbugs.gnu.org, miha@kamnitnik.top > > Is it worth having a function emacs-lisp-byte-compile-and-load? It's a command, and we deemed it important enough to have it in the Emacs-Lisp menu when the current buffer visits an Emacs Lisp file. > It surely is not used often. It is extremely useful when you work on some Lisp program and want to test it in the same session. > Does it simplify programs enough > to outweigh the added complecity of defining and docuenting it? Not programs, but interactive use of ELisp.