From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52293: 29.0.50; [PATCH v3] Prevent further cases of duplicated separators in context menus Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:23:38 +0200 Message-ID: <83pmq0n16d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86tufn5jn9.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86pmqa14fc.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <15eebcb1-b67a-8363-bc23-cf113913856f@gmail.com> <86h7bkhlo7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <37047ada-fa33-88dd-5237-769611fec61b@gmail.com> <83wnkfw8ud.fsf@gnu.org> <86ilvysyq3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <834k7ix4ij.fsf@gnu.org> <86pmq6taeb.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83czm6unfs.fsf@gnu.org> <414be477-34d4-c777-f623-3e0e59c0dd08@gmail.com> <83o85mpaqb.fsf@gnu.org> <83tufdmu4d.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19178"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 52293@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Jim Porter Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 13 13:26:24 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mwkPP-0004qf-Ll for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 13:26:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37112 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mwkPO-0004Nj-JY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 07:26:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60966) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mwkND-0002PF-IL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 07:24:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42760) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mwkN8-00021e-AT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 07:24:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mwkN8-0006P8-6b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 07:24:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52293 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 52293-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52293.163939823224598 (code B ref 52293); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 12:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 52293) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2021 12:23:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54306 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mwkMy-0006Og-Gm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 07:23:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60182) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mwkMw-0006OT-7h for 52293@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 07:23:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=56902 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mwkMq-00020F-GK; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 07:23:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=9HLLMBxgbCvOmB4zafPoMqAVxj4WL+HjVJ4GxN8EFAk=; b=MtxOHn7PpEoO iXDsfGwluMVM++su1hxLGQKXo4dzk9CsMBSpvd7IpWYmh2I+ko5VLyxI8fy2goIEuVrNTCXMU+06L bnYjpviJ9E22K4FH3CJw0ecpSzjnWa1xx99lfbBNQ5Rwu9K70w0tkzG/e51MEoMjLlONZexSIsyjS pPrH9mrEz2ildUSIqe8xJVglu426H3OkW9WPDvn/caw9feIzVfB3SfD3igluEZ8VNV/qXhXVAPfJw J9XGKZ1i8v7KM1+dpPCkOgi24uCwAGBpbvnBTgL8g41fT3U6PCrMwMX8Cc612kcFYhBkTds3rimaJ o3hSj2N7hoUwOBqUk9skMA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4470 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mwkMq-00077L-9r; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 07:23:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Jim Porter on Sun, 12 Dec 2021 13:59:16 -0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:222305 Archived-At: > Cc: 52293@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net > From: Jim Porter > Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 13:59:16 -0800 > > On 12/12/2021 12:43 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Cc: 52293@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net > >> From: Jim Porter > >> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 12:27:34 -0800 > >> > >> On 12/11/2021 11:02 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >>> Are you saying that we will be recommending a convention for separator > >>> names only for menus popped up in context-menu-mode? Does it make > >>> sense to have such a specialized convention? Isn't it possible to > >>> show context menus outside of the context-menu-mode? > >> > >> No, I think this convention should be recommended for separators used > >> anywhere in Emacs going forward. > > > > Ok, so then the effect of this change is wide, as I envisioned, and > > compatibility considerations still apply. > > I'm also ok with applying this naming convention *only* to context menus > and not treating this as a general guideline; that would still make it > easier to remember the names of each context menu separator without > having to double-check the source code. I don't think this would make sense, and I said that above.