From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:15:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83pmmab53s.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bkxu8k7t.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87bkxu8k7t.fsf@yahoo.com> <83wngiba3j.fsf@gnu.org> <874k3m8grb.fsf@yahoo.com> <87pmmauwtp.fsf@gmail.com> <87y20y6ypi.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35731"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, 54562@debbugs.gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 25 13:16:19 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nXira-0009CU-OV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 13:16:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33486 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXirZ-0002cE-CE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:16:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50278) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXirL-0002Za-8l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:16:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56512) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXirJ-00071q-S1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nXirJ-0008B3-K2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:16:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54562 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 54562-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54562.164821055931423 (code B ref 54562); Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54562) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Mar 2022 12:15:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50409 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nXirG-0008Ak-Se for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:15:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34318) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nXirE-0008AX-Hv for 54562@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:15:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=60396 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXir8-00070z-6k; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:15:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=S23C7dPycbsj9FQ+2Vx9111yP2eTCMtdEqILdDwpXd8=; b=XF5wpgyqT4Fb 718eYRTdOn0cdGIfknjcX/YWDEfJNgQrBDaDEB23si8uK7BcuCCGuHAoqvzgUBOlvD6j2Wx1kp7pz GpXTmujoNA2KT+KrzNu+ZXEkvczrIrLbzgr5xCf1WCbSO78NZMlkefatCmd3SaDf7sFVkXaH+2u0K 2hIns3t0S6NJSxbLPk9dnBgIhk9etYUj01jKPVVb/wWh/t8q+74/Ny5piBRdkRhfq/g1Um5ZS6ItD J2Bl3Jfgv6PDwEcMR3aIEMwwdKKBTvfMVrSQMy2QZJuAk7JjaZ8K7bEulCB9DRStOCQu1LlG5aZAl p8J1WpPExtwrn3/wDSyGiw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1125 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nXiqy-00055I-NB; Fri, 25 Mar 2022 08:15:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y20y6ypi.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Fri, 25 Mar 2022 19:47:21 +0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:228933 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 54562@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 19:47:21 +0800 > > Robert Pluim writes: > > > ... except when you use the correct emoji sequence, which in this case > > is > > > > U+0037 U+FE0F U+20E3 > > Hmm, odd, thanks. I wonder why other programs display the original > sequence correctly. Why do you think what they do is "correct"? AFAIK, we use the Unicode Standard's definition of Emoji sequences to decide when U+FE0F warrants an Emoji representation. maybe those other applications default to Emoji representation of every character that can possibly have such a representation, but in Emacs such a default cannot make sense.