From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49160: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Uninitialized inhibit_buffer_hooks Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 15:20:14 +0200 Message-ID: <83pmbh6ynl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874kdratxt.fsf@dick> <83fsxaunxe.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6mijmrb.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfggx21q.fsf@tcd.ie> <83wn5slt22.fsf@gnu.org> <871qo0vkkb.fsf@tcd.ie> <83tu0wkxq4.fsf@gnu.org> <jwvcz7jiuv5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38715"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 49160@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, contovob@tcd.ie Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 14 14:21:12 2023 Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org> Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>) id 1pGgT9-0009lg-Vk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 14:21:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces@gnu.org>) id 1pGgT1-0003rX-Uk; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 08:21:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pGgT0-0003qd-MI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 08:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pGgT0-0002u9-Di for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 08:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pGgT0-0005fE-1p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 08:21:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2023 13:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: <handler.49160.B49160.167370242021699@debbugs.gnu.org> Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49160 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 49160-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49160.167370242021699 (code B ref 49160); Sat, 14 Jan 2023 13:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49160) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2023 13:20:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53638 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1pGgSK-0005dv-C1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 08:20:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44840) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1pGgSI-0005dc-0d for 49160@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 08:20:19 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1pGgSB-0002f6-RZ; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 08:20:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=wsExVSzXWc+uIO7Ynp3xGvZ3mHwOtMPtc9bfmG4wU8Q=; b=H4PUlqd+blVU rTSlTokWQHE2ERn65SReG5zXT/GJlOiisWU7uVOXxghvYDomR7Xm3S1dDDbLkad5juwRf24aODBd9 /0XLKNhCewKlKXHtIJ9xAJWt1evvC7BhohxA5jxuXiTAaYMPWBzuUlM7j2qqRP9Af0LHwB6ALYUw2 Mn+xb/O9doG5d4stRb+IzlXhvNrhh1RlGdSizSkFgZaYwm+ZF8w0Ud5c+GcbbDuSHITk5FtNzeWAy 1RhtL5RhaJh4dwNW5uO5O1NdTOSuSSLAMUXpEhLdCC9gNBuaL7CSHv352U+sd5rxRJPiyly5Vjb9j WSzHT61vhotMp3pN1h48tw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1pGgSB-0003cQ-BF; Sat, 14 Jan 2023 08:20:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <jwvcz7jiuv5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan Monnier on Thu, 12 Jan 2023 11:25:40 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-gnu-emacs>, <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs> List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>, <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:253357 Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/253357> > From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> > Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie>, larsi@gnus.org, > 49160@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 11:25:40 -0500 > > >> > So I'm not sure we want this. What is the real-life use case behind > >> > this request? > >> > >> The real-life use case is satisfying this bug report+patch from me, > >> fixing what seems like a simple oversight, and the ensuing peace of mind > >> that I will be grateful for, of course ;). > > > > Stefan, WDYT? > > It makes the code simpler and fixes a bug, I'm all for it. > I don't think it's urgent, so it's not super important whether it goes > into `emacs-29`, OTOH. Installing it means the buffer-list-update-hook will not run when we generate an indirect buffer with this option. Is that reasonable? If you-two aren't averted by this effect, then let's install this on the emacs-29 branch.