From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#60886: 29.0.60; split-root-window-below broken for split-window-keep-point Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:05:48 +0200 Message-ID: <83pmbazvnn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86k01la7gn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83r0vs0z44.fsf@gnu.org> <61dc9888-cb02-5323-f86f-23bdb19c5893@gmx.at> <865yd33dkf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <952857f0-ceca-9677-992b-9a1659130a0f@gmx.at> <83zgafyqvj.fsf@gnu.org> <0bc1444b-cb79-43e1-d363-5e40ad317fa0@gmx.at> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32630"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 60886@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 19 11:18:09 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pIRzj-0008G5-11 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:18:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pIRou-0004d2-Vj; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 05:06:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pIRo2-0003wF-FL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 05:06:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pIRo2-0005FO-5W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 05:06:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pIRo1-0002fJ-JI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 05:06:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 10:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 60886 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 60886-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B60886.167412274010207 (code B ref 60886); Thu, 19 Jan 2023 10:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 60886) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jan 2023 10:05:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42656 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pIRng-0002eZ-HC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 05:05:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51188) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pIRne-0002eJ-4X for 60886@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 05:05:39 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pIRnY-0005Cm-NY; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 05:05:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=C/PvyqTm+hxW+ybu27iiArS02IqGEKUBXCHtCwCDHNY=; b=B2dDVD0glkkK GxknQKWtSZ9zIPphO7Dp5Qd3EITxQ26+DNn5HJq5mgn/9zMqWGcmq32vBvJaFEGfLDQ8tZEhAwweK 0tDSrCVnAwgLgCwjHj8rl/kqL+lPC4HjzElQkRD4aUBYppUH1NDINH4iVM07ribAffTat/Uemza6H dQEcWW4wIclFJiIM8X0OveBDNZmImCDovfrBBIDwETjxC1+ZNJVc+E+bxzbMAaWSN06DajR46hi4B j4OdrjM1cdvgrJeHyxxBmRVjdg3fX2p33041mIr5I/Wt3TUvdKSSO1911mhJilq4UlN1Tgleui2id IYAsqUYehZV2S26hYnaonA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pIRnX-0002OW-PK; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 05:05:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <0bc1444b-cb79-43e1-d363-5e40ad317fa0@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Thu, 19 Jan 2023 09:49:06 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:253691 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 09:49:06 +0100 > Cc: juri@linkov.net, 60886@debbugs.gnu.org > From: martin rudalics > > >> What is the "same buffer" when the root window is internal in > >> split-root-window-right/-below? > > > > I guess "the same buffer as the window which was split"? > > In the case sketched above the window which was split had no buffer. I guess I don't understand the use case then? how can that happen? And what would you suggest to say in the doc string instead?