From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63956: 29.0.91; tex-mode display problem in emacs-29 Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2023 21:14:22 +0300 Message-ID: <83pm61yigx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h6ri2u2i.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttvhkfw7.fsf@gnu.org> <8335313ise.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7lojthj.fsf@gnu.org> <837csb2731.fsf@gnu.org> <837csazff2.fsf@gnu.org> <83ttvexa1n.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33354"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 63956@debbugs.gnu.org, sds@gnu.org To: Jeff Norden , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 11 20:15:40 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q8PbH-0008TT-QW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 20:15:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q8Pal-0003Ba-NE; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 14:15:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q8Pag-0003BH-Ud for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 14:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q8Pag-0004PX-LZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 14:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q8Pag-0002nD-Ga for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 14:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2023 18:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63956 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 63956-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63956.168650725910667 (code B ref 63956); Sun, 11 Jun 2023 18:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63956) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jun 2023 18:14:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37734 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q8PZz-0002lz-HR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 14:14:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33682) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q8PZv-0002ld-LX for 63956@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 14:14:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q8PZp-0004KU-MK; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 14:14:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=VKsSnVmioaIvCOnFO+ehtPpsqTQqiqgXLk+MCLKalVs=; b=SWcMk/ZyjaNTA/1WIMrk L7vbXmGYcbCzl/1RHdyLBCAutMgEWikeRCDJcW7zp5m/eljABg0NbRTf3Z/8NSAH7Nvi7cLKJh80A yXD1AbZeRuARlnzS95LAkomWt8/cyo05TlevPGk/jEqdNskG4ZVXZBDZ9XVVpNwiSv6QPhJ/nm91k 25HfqpBLjnqIdKoonXB2iv1fHmFGT2zChVcWKIcV2GZDfDt5pgy9IbDxiRecIuOmyBPwFn21kUvpY 4sXvm+St2SAMwjsuq4L4DiN+LOpfSL76nwUJpVSc6OZnpVfiILeMqJ4LmrYRfVL0tdLU3co0fC/uC UvqN/a+znVEYwA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q8PZp-0008DE-6P; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 14:14:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Jeff Norden on Sun, 11 Jun 2023 12:31:54 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:263258 Archived-At: > From: Jeff Norden > Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2023 12:31:54 -0500 > Cc: sds@gnu.org, 63956@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 11:01 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > ... > > > I suggest just removing the actions from the two display-buffer calls > > > and the pop-top-buffer call in tex-mode.el. > > > > Meanwhile I installed a different fix: there's no a separate defcustom > > display-tex-shell-buffer-action, whose default should do what you > > want. If it doesn't do what you want, please tell the details, and > > let's take it from there. > > > > IOW, please try the latest emacs-29 branch of the Emacs Git > > repository, and see if tex-mode there behaves better. > > Works fine for me. Great, thanks for testing. > Using -tex-shell-buffer-action for a docview buffer is perhaps a bit > odd You could be right, but I couldn't find any callers of that function, so it was hard for me to reason about that specific case. Stefan, since you introduced tex-cmd-doc-view into tex-mode.el, could you take a look and tell whether using display-tex-shell-buffer-action in its default value there makes sense? If not, what would be a better default?