From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#64596: 30.0.50; On FIXME: in src/buffer.c:1481 (force-mode-line-update) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 08:48:45 +0300 Message-ID: <83pm4l24si.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877cr4nez9.fsf@localhost> <83lefj4okb.fsf@gnu.org> <83fs5r3tqv.fsf@gnu.org> <834jm6fppc.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5vyidy6.fsf@localhost> <83sf9qe2ip.fsf@gnu.org> <83a5vxejz6.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttu4gnpt.fsf@localhost> <83bkgb8xo5.fsf@gnu.org> <87jzuz1uq5.fsf@localhost> <83a5vv8edp.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttu2zydc.fsf@localhost> <83351m92jl.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1jeiw8t.fsf@localhost> <831qh6917k.fsf@gnu.org> <87msztv95v.fsf@localhost> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39043"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: yantar92@posteo.net, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 64596@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 21 07:49:21 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qMj0z-0009wy-Jc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 07:49:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMj0i-0005Q5-5B; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:49:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMj0g-0005Pw-Vg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:49:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMj0g-0006P0-Mr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qMj0g-0002D2-J4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 05:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 64596 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 64596-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B64596.16899185118437 (code B ref 64596); Fri, 21 Jul 2023 05:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 64596) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2023 05:48:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60373 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qMj0A-0002C0-Qh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:48:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52022) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qMj08-0002BM-29 for 64596@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:48:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMj01-0006Jd-Qy; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:48:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Y4c/+0iHsJMxvosf5lTsTpVy1JmvMOMOi8dM8LhSIfY=; b=r4Y0xq7KnEZP tVrfwLWtH5O0bHPLbuzGVwDk0kgsYkIEm2+uN4FKd7kKIVvx2aqT2HlOmpBCk1f9DoGIWW6VEBDt5 OASTPgShR1aN3rDhVr4NgWFTOLRdQleExSUpA5qrJQoUlzX5ZhfzZQHDo520RdJMNSxqb5TJ2Nlvw 0IXM/TXAtjUP24atrW7d4ZSI0LnUOgrtzJlDw33PlFFFL1gxUQ19MYiqouE/khuKrsSJVx4RC861k xU05oxNWOkCnkC4hSggQRSWEvgZoMyoeaRGaUZ180+2BsNRX23PhEBOjaC2J4PCCWFQsxFeYJ19nq g2Ql88JECdbV+kwR/TlWjw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qMizp-0002Jf-Um; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 01:48:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Richard Stallman on Thu, 20 Jul 2023 22:41:01 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:265652 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 64596@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 22:41:01 -0400 > > > Which immediately creates an impression that "redisplay" and "update" > > are referring to the same thing. > > It would be nice the highlight the distinction rightaway there. > > For me, they are two ways of thinking about the same action. > Redisplay is a little more terse and a little more technical in feel, > but concretely it means "updating the screen". Yes, it does. "Redisplay" is actually the name of the entire process, which includes "update_frame" as its last step. I have modified the commentary in xdisp.c to make this "30KFt view" of redisplay more clear at first reading.