From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68006: 30.0.50; Image-mode speed Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 19:43:35 +0200 Message-ID: <83plyhvvso.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87le9jlfd6.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83wmt3bkla.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6k6lgdy.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83wmt29zfy.fsf@gnu.org> <87il4m6rcx.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83bkae9j11.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkadyqdk.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <8334voanr1.fsf@gnu.org> <877cl0zvln.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83y1dg954u.fsf@gnu.org> <87zfxvalnq.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83o7eb938y.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmsxmff3.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83mstt5hrk.fsf@gnu.org> <87frzjvpb5.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83le9a3kqs.fsf@gnu.org> <83zfxnzyrb.fsf@gnu.org> <87mstnafie.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83r0izzn1p.fsf@gnu.org> <87le95rqoh.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12956"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, 68006@debbugs.gnu.org To: Manuel Giraud Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 04 18:45:19 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rLRmQ-00039V-8t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 18:45:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLRm8-0004eU-8B; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 12:45:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLRm6-0004eH-Qt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 12:44:58 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLRm6-00031s-Il for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 12:44:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLRmA-00069z-BO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 12:45:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 17:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68006 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 68006-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68006.170439024523587 (code B ref 68006); Thu, 04 Jan 2024 17:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68006) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jan 2024 17:44:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55608 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLRlE-00068L-Mq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 12:44:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47968) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLRlA-00067g-Kk for 68006@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 12:44:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLRl0-0002vW-K1; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 12:43:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=v1O28KbK6Z6adYYBUa+pRQ8nlAe7gvybPTzIa/6OS1Y=; b=J/5mtvxZhJPj N0MjW8JqV5+SjbuzIGM2/LuasCywyZTE/NFe1Bxarw+xqMZIWuBt5PKzaezyQ1/5xtKRe9hlbtGO+ Ms0O3Ix2fLDIGoczITjsQGTlbXsKYYSlq2JdWB+LpBHxpuejeqrGdC3Bz5GZ5ahoxGsju7/7spVvz 7RMRaIr1hGUm1qiWb7IK61FnJw/b3fXfx6SrePfZ7lnexSJI6AkoGWZYKgFLuNaxpcE67woLlM7la eDeTBy6m3AtJNkMbeE6AIzqA0MdyZaUIAZJ//9+YXy9vDqE8qLn3UGcvjXwfEVfo4+T8uYg7vxHZ2 H8KlKWltiFYtvZfQ/WnMyg==; In-Reply-To: <87le95rqoh.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> (message from Manuel Giraud on Thu, 04 Jan 2024 17:47:42 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:277323 Archived-At: > From: Manuel Giraud > Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, 68006@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 17:47:42 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> Do you think we need a completely different cache or just some handles > >> on the current one? > > > > A different cache, I think. > > Hi, > > I've tried to think about it a bit but I don't understand why do you > think it should be a different one. Because its purpose is different, and the conditions to flush are also different. > With `image-cache-eviction-delay' being 300 seconds by default, I > think this is enough time for this usage too. I'm not sure I understand why time since caching is relevant for the purpose that you want to cache images. Suppose there's an image that should be displayed during the entire session -- how does it make sense to remove it from the cache after 5 minutes? OTOH, another image that is displayed just once doesn't need to be cached for more than a few seconds.