From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8644: font-locking of multi-author changelog entries Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 23:17:06 +0300 Message-ID: <83oc3agvjx.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305058697 29759 80.91.229.12 (10 May 2011 20:18:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 20:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8644@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 10 22:18:12 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJtNe-0002Iq-LS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 22:18:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56071 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJtNe-0002Kr-24 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:18:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44451) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJtNb-0002KY-9Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:18:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJtNa-00053Y-Ag for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59091) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJtNa-00053S-8m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJtNZ-0000nX-Pu; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 20:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8644 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8644-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8644.13050586323000 (code B ref 8644); Tue, 10 May 2011 20:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8644) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2011 20:17:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJtMl-0000mL-OY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:17:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJtMh-0000m3-Hg for 8644@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:17:08 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LKZ00K00XDU2400@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 8644@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:17:01 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.234.175]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LKZ00IIJXOAW1E0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:16:59 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 16:18:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46373 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:39:03 -0400 > > With multi-author ChangeLog entries, eg: > > 2011-05-10 Me > You > > (I don't actually know if that's the correct format for such entries, > but I guess it is something like that), the second (and third etc if > present) author is not font-locked by change-log-mode. I never really understood the need for these entries. How can two or more people write some piece of code? Ideas cannot be copyrighted, so only the one who wrote the final version should be named, the rest can be attributed as "suggested by" or whatever.