From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8463: 24.0.50; [PATCH] Direct Edit in *Occur* Buffer Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:54:49 +0300 Message-ID: <83oc27ba8m.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1307613341 12497 80.91.229.12 (9 Jun 2011 09:55:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:55:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8463@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 09 11:55:37 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QUbxf-0005lO-77 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:55:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44754 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUbxd-0005eJ-VW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 05:55:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUbxC-0005b0-Mk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 05:55:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUbxA-0007XZ-D2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 05:55:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50543) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUbx9-0007XC-W2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 05:55:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QUbx8-0001On-AV; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 05:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8463 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 8463-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8463.13076132985367 (code B ref 8463); Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8463) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2011 09:54:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QUbx3-0001OV-MB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 05:54:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QUbx1-0001OJ-1w for 8463@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 05:54:55 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LMI00400NK5IJ00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 8463@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:54:47 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.223.140]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LMI003HKOV9FJD0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:54:46 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 05:55:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47061 Archived-At: > From: Leo > Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:44:11 +0800 > Cc: 8463@debbugs.gnu.org > > On 2011-06-09 13:14 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote: > >> revid 22063400b. > > > > Speaking for myself, I have no idea what that means. > > That's what I saw on the annotation buffer (from C-x v g). I was able to > view the diff there with 'd'. Git sha values are generally not useful for someone who uses bzr. It would be nice if people who report problems could also mention the bzr revision or revid.