From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9221: Memory leak Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 06:03:43 +0300 Message-ID: <83oc079oxc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <821ux3mkto.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312340800 8977 80.91.229.12 (3 Aug 2011 03:06:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 03:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9221@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andy Moreton Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 03 05:06:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QoRn0-0003gM-VP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:06:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43610 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QoRn0-0000lr-E8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 23:06:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56814) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QoRmy-0000lk-Eo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 23:06:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QoRmx-0006s6-M3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 23:06:32 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QoRmx-0006s2-JL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 23:06:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QoRnS-0004mM-CG; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 23:07:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 03:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9221 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9221-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9221.131234078618327 (code B ref 9221); Wed, 03 Aug 2011 03:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9221) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2011 03:06:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QoRmq-0004lX-Uh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 23:06:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QoRmk-0004lK-42 for 9221@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 23:06:20 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LPC00C000GWYT00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 9221@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 06:05:45 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.48.51]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LPC00CHK0LKKXB0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 06:05:45 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <821ux3mkto.fsf@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 23:07:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49866 Archived-At: > From: Andy Moreton > Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:53:55 +0100 > > Yes. My w32 buildon WinXP also shows ever-growing memory consumption. > The growth rate is slower if I add: > > (setq-default bidi-display-reordering nil) Do you use Gnus? > I haven't biesected this yet, but I can do so if it helps. It will help, yes. My prime suspect is revision 105208. TIA