From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19606: 24.4; Emacs hangs when editing a 5-line Org file Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:14:46 +0200 Message-ID: <83oapz3o89.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86mw5kktly.fsf@example.com> <86lhl32a5e.fsf@example.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421345726 3611 80.91.229.3 (15 Jan 2015 18:15:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:15:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19606@debbugs.gnu.org To: Fabrice Niessen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 15 19:15:22 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YBowz-0006We-GF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:15:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52109 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YBowy-0003x5-TM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:15:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46540) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YBowr-0003op-10 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:15:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YBowl-0002DU-Ti for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:15:12 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49108) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YBowh-00022S-Jb; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:15:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YBowh-0007yl-3k; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:15:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19606 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,org-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 19606-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19606.142134568130630 (code B ref 19606); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19606) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jan 2015 18:14:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57969 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YBowL-0007xw-9M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:14:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:59605) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YBowI-0007xi-CK for 19606@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 13:14:39 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NI800B00D0RMG00@mtaout26.012.net.il> for 19606@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:14:17 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NI80063PDBTXE60@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:14:17 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <86lhl32a5e.fsf@example.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98384 Archived-At: > From: Fabrice Niessen > Cc: 19606@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:04:13 +0100 > > > Thanks, but what do you expect us to do with this report, without any > > information whatsoever regarding your customizations? > > I thought that, thanks to the backtrace, you could find the culprit, or > reduce the scope of the search, as you often succeed to do. But you didn't even show the backtrace from the main (a.k.a. "Lisp") thread. Your backtrace is from thread 15, whereas the main thread is thread 1. You need to type "thread 1" before "backtrace" to provide the (possibly) interesting backtrace.