From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22314: 25.1.50; Document variable `deactivate-mark' in Elisp manual Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 12:49:00 +0200 Message-ID: <83oacwpcrn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <<88046cae-d0e4-4108-b655-5ed142ea97f7@default>> <<83fuyb50jl.fsf@gnu.org>> <2d847088-3f43-4771-9178-4c51081da5d5@default> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452250227 22923 80.91.229.3 (8 Jan 2016 10:50:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22314@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 08 11:50:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aHUcU-0006Mz-TC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 11:50:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35016 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHUcU-0004fe-2f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 05:50:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51839) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHUcQ-0004fO-Er for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 05:50:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHUcM-0003ji-6z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 05:50:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54092) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHUcM-0003je-3u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 05:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHUcL-0000PC-Ud for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 05:50:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22314 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22314-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22314.14522501541489 (code B ref 22314); Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22314) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2016 10:49:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42312 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHUba-0000Nx-3c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 05:49:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60540) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHUbY-0000Nk-Mu for 22314@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 05:49:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHUbP-0003X1-62 for 22314@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 05:49:07 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41464) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aHUbP-0003Wx-2c; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 05:49:03 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1264 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aHUbO-0005wB-E0; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 05:49:02 -0500 In-reply-to: <2d847088-3f43-4771-9178-4c51081da5d5@default> (message from Drew Adams on Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:08:22 -0800 (PST)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:111368 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:08:22 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 22314@debbugs.gnu.org > > My bad. It is already documented. I didn't notice it because > it is not one of the index entries for `deactivate-mark'. > I think it should be. They are both indexed, AFAICS. Why did you think the variable isn't? The descriptions appear next to each other, so a single index entry for both seems like TRT. Am I missing something?