From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25557: Documentation of format doesn't describe "g" accurately Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 22:29:46 +0200 Message-ID: <83o9yrx70l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <78ace0d5-59f1-0d7d-1f0e-b589a947d76c@live.com> <83poj7zika.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8abyzqs.fsf@gnu.org> <1b896eed-9041-83d3-bd46-cde7e534223e@live.com> <837f5fyy09.fsf@gnu.org> <2763023c-ff54-ea65-c1b0-0c22e948f48a@live.com> <831svnywwf.fsf@gnu.org> <5b3f43e8-195d-777c-e660-302a3baf5f61@live.com> <83tw8jx9p3.fsf@gnu.org> <1c6fc160-2c5f-a82d-b3cc-641f08dbf160@live.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485635487 31310 195.159.176.226 (28 Jan 2017 20:31:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 20:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25557@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 28 21:31:23 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXZeR-0006gC-Fs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 21:31:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53058 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXZeV-0002ho-78 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 15:31:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42143) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXZeL-0002hX-Q0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 15:31:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXZeI-0007kD-MO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 15:31:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXZeI-0007k7-JF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 15:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXZeI-0001Nt-DH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 15:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 20:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25557 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25557-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25557.14856354112567 (code B ref 25557); Sat, 28 Jan 2017 20:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25557) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jan 2017 20:30:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49440 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXZdT-0000f5-4F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 15:30:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50998) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXZdR-0000Xl-4U for 25557@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 15:30:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXZdI-0007YZ-U2 for 25557@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 15:30:04 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40237) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXZdI-0007YV-Qa; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 15:30:00 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2641 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cXZdH-0002N6-KB; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 15:30:00 -0500 In-reply-to: <1c6fc160-2c5f-a82d-b3cc-641f08dbf160@live.com> (message from =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel on Sat, 28 Jan 2017 15:06:22 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:128734 Archived-At: > Cc: 25557@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Clément Pit--Claudel > Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 15:06:22 -0500 > > > ??? (format "%d" 3.0) => "3" > > > > Or maybe you didn't think 3.0 was an "integral value" by my > > definition? I meant by that any value VAL which yields zero when > > passed through (mod VAL 1.0). > > Yup, I misunderstood your definition of integral value. But that still doesn't cover formatting e.g. 3.3 as "3.3" instead of "3.30", right? Yes, but that cannot be a problem, since you said the browsers supported 2 digits after the decimal. Or you could get fancier by using %.1f for values for which (zerop (mod (* 10 VAL) 1.0)) is non-nil.