From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25658: 26.0.50; ELisp part in a mail isn't encoded properly Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:44:07 +0200 Message-ID: <83o9y61w7s.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k28y4h6j.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486964730 31163 195.159.176.226 (13 Feb 2017 05:45:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25658@debbugs.gnu.org To: Katsumi Yamaoka Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 13 06:45:16 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cd9Ro-0006Wz-61 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 06:45:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54659 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd9Ro-000748-Lj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:45:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd9Rh-00072q-32 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:45:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd9Re-0006Hv-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:45:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39509) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd9Rd-0006Hm-St for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:45:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cd9Rd-000473-Kd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:45:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25658 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25658-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25658.148696464215717 (code B ref 25658); Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25658) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2017 05:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37708 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cd9Qg-00045O-60 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39676) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cd9Qf-000451-83 for 25658@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:44:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd9QX-0006A1-0W for 25658@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:43:56 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54154) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd9QW-00069x-TO; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:43:52 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4897 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cd9QV-0007Ya-Aw; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 00:43:51 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Katsumi Yamaoka on Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:05:41 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:129298 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:05:41 +0900 > From: Katsumi Yamaoka > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 25658@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:33:26 -0500, Glenn Morris wrote: > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Then why doesn't Gnus do exactly that? > > Could it be... a bug?! ;) > > Ok. So, > > cd lisp/gnus > egrep '\((decode|encode)-coding-region' *.el|wc -l > => 10 > > are they all potentially bugs? Not necessarily, they need to be reviewed one by one. My question was triggered by the fact that "what Gnus wants" was so much simpler and obviously correct that it was a clear winner IMO. If the other places are all of the same variety, then yes, I'd suggest to make similar replacements there as well.