From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34749: 26.1; `delete-windows-on': (1) doc, (2) bug, (3) bug, (4) candidates Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 12:27:39 +0200 Message-ID: <83o96lacf8.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="134710"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34749@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 08 11:29:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Ckb-000YxR-Uf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 11:29:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40583 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2Cka-0004rk-Rz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 05:29:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54614) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2CkQ-0004qP-Vc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 05:29:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2CkQ-0000Of-BM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 05:29:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2CkQ-0000OW-5Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 05:29:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2CkQ-0006kt-0M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 05:29:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 10:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34749 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34749-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34749.155204088925899 (code B ref 34749); Fri, 08 Mar 2019 10:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34749) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2019 10:28:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35864 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2CjX-0006jZ-T4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 05:28:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39964) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2CjW-0006j5-20 for 34749@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 05:28:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54132) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2CjP-0007ut-8g; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 05:28:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1635 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h2CjN-0000rC-PW; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 05:27:58 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Drew Adams on Mon, 4 Mar 2019 08:25:54 -0800 (PST)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156140 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 08:25:54 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > > 1. The doc string should first of all completely describe the > interactive behavior and only secondarily describe the Lisp behavior > (completely). > > In particular, this doc string should say explicitly what happens with a > prefix arg, including what happens with different kinds of raw prefix > arg (including, but not limited to, 0). I fixed this, although not regarding the order. the doc string is not too long, so interspersing the description of interactive behavior with non-interactive is not a catastrophe. Btw, it is a pity that only the prefix arg of zero is useful in interactive usage, which doesn't let the user select the other behaviors regarding the optional FRAME argument. I think this could/should be improved by relatively straightforward changes that use values of prefix arg other than zero. > The doc string should also say that a prefix arg is ignored when the > condition of the last paragraph applies (dedicated window alone in > frame, with other frames existing), if that's true. I didn't understand what this alludes to.