From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37852: Build failure on MSYS2 (undefined reference to _chk functions) Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 21:51:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83o8y8zka3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h8411p4u.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="52814"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: rcopley@gmail.com, 37852@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 22 20:52:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iMzGM-000DYk-9k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 20:52:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41072 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMzGL-0002de-6G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 14:52:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33160) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMzGF-0002dW-Pm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 14:52:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMzGE-0004JQ-Pe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 14:52:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51671) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMzGE-0004JK-Mn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 14:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMzGE-0002t1-Hz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 14:52:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37852 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37852-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37852.157177027411036 (code B ref 37852); Tue, 22 Oct 2019 18:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37852) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2019 18:51:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60492 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMzFS-0002rw-CI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 14:51:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52198) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMzFP-0002rg-FM for 37852@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 14:51:12 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35245) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMzFJ-0003ea-Qw; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 14:51:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1896 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iMzFJ-0000Ci-6V; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 14:51:05 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Paul Eggert on Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:27:48 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:170005 Archived-At: > Cc: 37852@debbugs.gnu.org, rcopley@gmail.com > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:27:48 -0700 > > > Should we perhaps test for -lssp, and if it is found, add it to the > > link command when we define _FORTIFY_SOURCE? > > If this is done only on MSYS2 platforms, and if -lssp is used only when > it causes otherwise-failing programs to work, then it should be OK. I > wouldn't do it elsewhere because on Fedora at any rate, -lssp used to be > trouble and was best avoided. Right. > It vaguely sounds like MSYS2 is trailing Fedora and so is experiencing > problems Fedora had a few years ago (see, e.g., > ). I actually think it's a bug in MSYS2, and hope they will fix it soon. So perhaps we should just wait and see if the current situation, after your patch, is good enough. Thanks.