From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 10:38:16 +0200 Message-ID: <83o8xc6wsn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87eeyd3ul0.fsf@bernoul.li> <83d0dt2qt6.fsf@gnu.org> <87a78xnrp0.fsf@bernoul.li> <835zjl2mzs.fsf@gnu.org> <87eey8og08.fsf@bernoul.li> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="229024"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 38181@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jonas Bernoulli Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 16 09:39:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iVtbu-000xRD-5H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 09:39:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46898 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVtbs-0003Dq-8E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 03:39:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56522) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVtbj-0003A9-FT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 03:39:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVtbi-0005q2-Gq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 03:39:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57108) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVtbi-0005py-E1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 03:39:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVtbi-0000K8-Af for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 03:39:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 08:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38181 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38181-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38181.15738935071202 (code B ref 38181); Sat, 16 Nov 2019 08:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38181) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Nov 2019 08:38:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37696 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVtb9-0000JK-2a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 03:38:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47390) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVtb6-0000J5-3l for 38181@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 03:38:25 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46688) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVtb0-0005Wu-Vi; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 03:38:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1550 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iVtb0-0000ne-7f; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 03:38:18 -0500 In-reply-to: <87eey8og08.fsf@bernoul.li> (message from Jonas Bernoulli on Sat, 16 Nov 2019 00:51:19 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171709 Archived-At: > From: Jonas Bernoulli > Cc: 38181@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 00:51:19 +0100 > > > An alternative would be to scale the image so that it doesn't enlarge > > the mode line, btw. Is that possible in your use cases? > > No because enlarging the mode-line is one of the things I did in order > to make it prettier (imo). It's a goal not a means or side-effect. If this is to make the mode line prettier, then it should be done once, at the beginning of a session, right? In that case, why calling redisplay after loading the package or enabling a feature is not a solution?