From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43381: 27.1.50; Maybe wrong cursor FG color in NS port Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:55:14 +0300 Message-ID: <83o8m784z1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a6xtff19.fsf@gnus.org> <20200913234309.GH93185@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <87d02pdyp4.fsf@gnus.org> <83363kbeci.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1r39qmb.fsf@gnus.org> <83v9gf85hj.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13153"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 43381@debbugs.gnu.org, alan@idiocy.org, dale@codefu.org To: larsi@gnus.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 15 16:56:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kICNN-0003J0-Dd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:56:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47240 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kICNM-0003v2-Fi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:56:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kICNG-0003tL-Kh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48565) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kICNG-0005em-Ad for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kICNG-0006b0-8R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43381 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 43381-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43381.160018172825312 (code B ref 43381); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2020 14:55:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60111 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kICMh-0006aB-7j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:55:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57316) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kICMY-0006Zl-25 for 43381@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:55:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46612) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kICMQ-0005Pt-Ie; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:55:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2749 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kICMN-0003OR-QF; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:55:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83v9gf85hj.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:44:08 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:188122 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:44:08 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 43381@debbugs.gnu.org, alan@idiocy.org, dale@codefu.org > > > Or should we fix the code? As the example demonstrates, this makes some > > of the inverse-blinked text difficult to read. > > Any specific suggestions for a fix? > > > Presumably the colour distance between the cursor and the default > > face's background is more legible? > > If you imply that we should sometimes refuse to merge faces, I'd > object to that, since we never do such things anywhere. > > Maybe it's enough to define (and handle) a distant-foreground color > for the cursor face? Oh, and of course the documentation should be fixed regardless, as it is inaccurate, and will continue to be inaccurate even if we fix this in some way.