From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43631: 28.0.50; CC Mode multiline strings grinds performance to a halt Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 16:43:05 +0300 Message-ID: <83o8lsr6vq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lfgwwzw6.fsf@thornhill.no> <83pn68rcio.fsf@gnu.org> <87eemo4sor.fsf@thornhill.no> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30298"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 43631@debbugs.gnu.org To: Theodor Thornhill Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 26 15:44:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kMAUn-0007mo-Nj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 15:44:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59568 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMAUm-00079q-QK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 09:44:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50758) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMAUc-00072o-KK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 09:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34587) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMAUc-0002wP-BA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 09:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMAUc-00049u-9F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 09:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 13:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43631 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43631-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43631.160112779915930 (code B ref 43631); Sat, 26 Sep 2020 13:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43631) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2020 13:43:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46133 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMATu-00048s-Mp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 09:43:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43664) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMATs-00048c-8o for 43631@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 09:43:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60178) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMATm-0002rS-94; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 09:43:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2961 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kMATl-0003ML-H3; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 09:43:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87eemo4sor.fsf@thornhill.no> (message from Theodor Thornhill on Sat, 26 Sep 2020 14:40:36 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:189023 Archived-At: > From: Theodor Thornhill > Cc: 43631@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 14:40:36 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > All the profiles posted there end prematurely, thus making it > > impossible to make independent conclusions regarding the possible > > culprits. Would it be possible to post here a full profile, > > completely expanded, obtained after loading all the relevant *.el > > files as *.el (NOT *.elc!), so that the profile is detailed enough to > > show the relevant parts? It would make the discussion much more > > focused. > > > > Bonus points for posting another profile, where the feature you think > > is the main culprit is disabled. > > > > TIA > > > Attached is two reports, one which is super slow, and one that is fast. Thanks, but please post the text of Profiler-Report buffer, not the internal structure it produces.