From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44065: 28.0.50; SVG image not shown completely Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 17:51:57 +0300 Message-ID: <83o8kyp8tu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pn5ga0wt.fsf@gmail.com> <83v9f7r2bl.fsf@gnu.org> <83pn5fqzqc.fsf@gnu.org> <874kmrijs5.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8kzqxeq.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1pve8h5.fsf@gmx.net> <83h7qrqvbj.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu0je7mt.fsf@gmx.net> <83blgzqunb.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn5efvw6.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38687"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44065@debbugs.gnu.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net, styang@fastmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 19 16:53:26 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWXO-0009ye-89 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 16:53:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47776 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWXN-0000Cg-96 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:53:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35802) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWW2-0007Sb-1b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58698) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWW1-0008EC-Nb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:52:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWW1-0001mJ-ML for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:52:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44065 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44065-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44065.16031191186826 (code B ref 44065); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44065) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2020 14:51:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42011 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWVy-0001m2-BE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:51:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57196) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWVw-0001lp-Iu for 44065@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:51:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35188) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWVr-0008CQ-2q; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:51:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1806 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kUWVq-0007mj-JQ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:51:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87pn5efvw6.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:43:53 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:190991 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Stephen Berman , 44065@debbugs.gnu.org, > styang@fastmail.com > Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:43:53 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> > Maybe it depends on the version of librsvg? or some dependency of > >> > librsvg? > >> > >> My system uses librsvg-2.48.2. > > > > 2.40.1 here. > > 2.50.1 here. So it looks like something changed between 2.40 and 2.48 > somewhere. But is it interesting, given that Imagemagick doesn't like the image? Invalid images can cause all kinds of weird problems which depend on versions of the image libraries in use.