From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46042: 27.1; xref-revert-buffer will delete buffer contents Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 16:01:36 +0200 Message-ID: <83o8h7yh8f.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4fed5006-8c77-9489-2030-f5eb7af308ac@yandex.ru> <834kj85bcy.fsf@gnu.org> <169bde3a-3bdf-1f5d-0365-6255d9c2a5c3@yandex.ru> <62acb614-2091-d9a2-68b2-b489d9a413f1@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35744"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: evangelou@gmail.com, 46042@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 29 15:02:31 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l5UM3-0009Aq-FH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:02:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47214 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5UM2-0000y7-DP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:02:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38304) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5ULa-0000wo-Bq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39855) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5ULa-0007jo-2F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l5ULZ-0004HO-Ug for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:02:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46042 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46042-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46042.161192888816379 (code B ref 46042); Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46042) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2021 14:01:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51401 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l5UL1-0004G7-L5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:01:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48534) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l5UL0-0004Ft-5S for 46042@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:01:26 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5UKu-0007Rj-EV; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:01:20 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3329 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l5UKs-0003K1-OA; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:01:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <62acb614-2091-d9a2-68b2-b489d9a413f1@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:54:35 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:198870 Archived-At: > From: Dmitry Gutov > Cc: evangelou@gmail.com, 46042@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:54:35 +0200 > > Hi Eli, > > I've just fixed a minor bug in the new implementation (e86b30d6fd). > > Can I backport that to emacs-27 now? Yes. But emacs-27.1.91 is already out...