From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44211: 26.3; Repeated `` and '' in Info (eintr)`GNU Free Documentation License' Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:03:53 +0200 Message-ID: <83o8folrx2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <76db0515-b5b0-4c7a-91d6-5c11b03696f2@default> <83k0vef5j9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19626"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44211@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 09:05:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKcnL-0004zD-4H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:05:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35686 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKcnK-0006MD-74 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 03:05:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57606) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKcn9-0006M3-7R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 03:05:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKcn7-0006ZH-S2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 03:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKcn7-0005jq-KQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 03:05:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44211 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44211-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44211.161553626222010 (code B ref 44211); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44211) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2021 08:04:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55958 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKcmT-0005iw-Qr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 03:04:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39444) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKcmS-0005ij-Bh for 44211@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 03:04:20 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55961) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKcmM-00062Z-NW; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 03:04:14 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2398 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lKclz-0004BK-FS; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 03:04:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Thu, 11 Mar 2021 19:07:28 -0600) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202146 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 19:07:28 -0600 > Cc: 44211@debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com > > > But the markup seems correct. Is this a bug in makeinfo perhaps? > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > It is not a bug. That's what @example does. > > So should we replace this with “ and ” or should we close this as > wontfix? This is a legal blurb we have in all our manuals, so the format there should be identical and coordinated with the FSF. But wait a minute: I don't think I understand the bug report anymore, because of 2 reasons: . the Texinfo source uses @quotation, not @example, so I'm unsure why I mentioned @example in my response, likely a mistake on my part; . more importantly, the text in the Info file uses “..” quoting So I now tend to think that Drew was looking at an old version of Info manuals, which were produced by makeinfo before we started using UTF-8 encoding as the default output encoding of our manuals, and that is the reason for the original issue. If I'm right, the bug should be closed as being fixed long ago.