From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49687: [PATCH] Add mode-line-compact variable to Customize Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 15:18:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83o8au35k5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87fsw7nxj4.fsf@gnus.org> <835yx24xo4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6memtmo.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15362"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ilya.ostapyshyn@gmail.com, 49687@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 22 14:21:06 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m6XhJ-0003sQ-GB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:21:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44650 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m6XhI-00039T-Ht for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:21:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m6XfK-0000ei-L3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56258) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m6XfK-0003Nt-C8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m6XfK-0000os-8H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:19:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49687 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 49687-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49687.16269563413136 (code B ref 49687); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49687) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2021 12:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39570 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m6XfI-0000oV-SU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:19:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48690) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m6XfF-0000oI-Se for 49687@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:18:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50042) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m6XfA-0003Ih-Mv; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:18:52 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3197 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m6XfA-0001J1-B7; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:18:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a6memtmo.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:15:59 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:210511 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: ilya.ostapyshyn@gmail.com, 49687@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:15:59 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > AFAIK, we don't normally show values in parentheses like that. Why is > > it a good idea in this case (or at all)? > > It's not -- but quite a few of the options defined in that file do this, > so it was probably just patterned on that. > > I've now removed the lisp values from those strings of all the user > options defined in that form. Thanks.