From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39663: 27.1; ebnf2ps bugs Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:09:30 +0300 Message-ID: <83o89cqyyt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <631D6235-82DE-46FE-9264-453F00ED77F7@acm.org> <87o89fag2z.fsf@gnus.org> <83wno3jdq3.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7f676nm.fsf@gnus.org> <838s0hu72m.fsf@gnu.org> <87y28ghgb7.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4312"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 39663@debbugs.gnu.org, mattiase@acm.org, viniciusjl.gnu@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 01 14:14:34 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLP8T-0000y3-HS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:14:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60384 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLP8S-0003eg-6u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:14:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLP46-0004iK-0x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53238) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLP45-0004VE-PJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:10:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLP45-0002Ok-Jg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:10:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 12:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39663 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 39663-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39663.16304981969201 (code B ref 39663); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 12:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39663) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 12:09:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36551 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLP3r-0002O9-Vv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:09:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43544) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLP3j-0002Nd-1i for 39663@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:09:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45070) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLP3d-0004Fe-Ox; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:09:33 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1035 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLP3c-0002W9-La; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:09:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y28ghgb7.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:05:00 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:213172 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: mattiase@acm.org, 39663@debbugs.gnu.org, viniciusjl.gnu@gmail.com, > monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:05:00 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > The raw bytes in the buffer, if they are present, are already in their > > "decoded" multibyte form. So I don't think I see how the decoding > > could help there. Do you have an example? > > Uhm... no, I think that was a thinko -- the decode is a NOOP here, > isn't it? I think so. And quite an expensive one, because I don't see any test anywhere that would return without doing anything.