From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16615: 24.3.50; Fatal error visiting a directory (same as #16132?) Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 22:12:54 +0200 Message-ID: <83mwia4mnt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83r47m4s9m.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391285651 21268 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2014 20:14:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 20:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16615@debbugs.gnu.org To: Richard Copley Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 01 21:14:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W9gxF-0002S8-MD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 21:14:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39051 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9gxF-0001Os-8c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:14:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55459) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9gx6-0001Oi-21 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:14:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9gx0-00081M-8A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:14:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59578) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9gx0-00081G-4m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:14:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9gwz-0007Q8-LJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:14:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 20:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16615 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16615-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16615.139128559728459 (code B ref 16615); Sat, 01 Feb 2014 20:14:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16615) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2014 20:13:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45364 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9gwG-0007Ow-Lw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:13:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il ([80.179.55.181]:46761) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9gwB-0007Ol-Ui for 16615@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:13:14 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0C008002CE7P00@mtaout25.012.net.il> for 16615@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 22:12:36 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N0C009JU2T0MK00@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 22:12:36 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84412 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 19:34:00 +0000 > From: Richard Copley > Cc: 16615@debbugs.gnu.org > > Perhaps some problem with type-punning LARGE_INTEGER/ULARGE_INTEGER under > -fstrict-aliasing. I doubt that (but where would -fstrict-aliasing come from?). Please try the latest trunk and see if its solves the problem.