From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19988: 25.0.50; Drag events ending in different frame Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 19:22:54 +0200 Message-ID: <83mw3sptht.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k2yycfwh.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3t5q11o.fsf@gnu.org> <87mw3tfdn8.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1425489861 23186 80.91.229.3 (4 Mar 2015 17:24:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 17:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19988@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 04 18:24:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YTD1o-0005gt-Im for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 18:24:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45497 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTD1n-0000Fe-R4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:24:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40797) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTD1j-0000Bu-QH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:24:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTD1e-0003j9-Rq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:24:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36622) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTD1e-0003iz-PA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:24:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTD1e-0001Th-Fe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:24:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 17:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19988 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19988-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19988.14254897875613 (code B ref 19988); Wed, 04 Mar 2015 17:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19988) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Mar 2015 17:23:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35190 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTD0k-0001ST-OG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:23:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:44299) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTD0i-0001Rt-Hd for 19988@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 12:23:05 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NKP008006PMRR00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for 19988@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 19:21:24 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NKP006VU6VOKV30@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 19:21:24 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87mw3tfdn8.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100058 Archived-At: > From: Tassilo Horn > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 19988@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 08:03:07 +0100 > > > FWIW, the current behavior is probably useful in the case where the drag > > is used in order to select a region. IOW, we should probably include > > *both* informations. > > I don't get your statement. When selecting a region, you're restricted > to one window anyway, no? Stefan thinks about dragging the mouse outside of the frame, to another frame: you'd still want to select only text in the window you started. > And that situation is already covered as one would expect. What do you mean by "as one would expect"? On my machine, the behavior is unreasonable: the wrong part of text is selected. So, Stefan, it looks like this doesn't work with the current code, either.