From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20727: 24.5; Font fallback doesn't work for the Emoji range Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 22:03:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83mw03ph0m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <557B47B6.4080600@cs.ucla.edu> <837fr8q8dr.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4jnq0vz.fsf@gnu.org> <557C53E2.6070706@cs.ucla.edu> <83si9vpo0i.fsf@gnu.org> <557C633D.8090508@cs.ucla.edu> <83pp4zpk2s.fsf@gnu.org> <557C7AAB.2090609@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1434222323 19749 80.91.229.3 (13 Jun 2015 19:05:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 19:05:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: v.schneidermann@gmail.com, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, 20727@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 13 21:05:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z3qjx-0004BV-UM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 21:05:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56822 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z3qjx-0005q1-BA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:05:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59683) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z3qju-0005pw-By for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:05:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z3qjn-0003Ve-LW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:05:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38514) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z3qjn-0003VQ-Ip for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:05:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z3qjn-0007Er-9K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:05:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 19:05:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20727 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 20727-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20727.143422224427752 (code B ref 20727); Sat, 13 Jun 2015 19:05:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20727) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jun 2015 19:04:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52974 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z3qip-0007DY-PK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:04:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:35366) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z3qin-0007D0-AV for 20727@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NPW00I00COOH000@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 20727@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 22:03:54 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NPW00IL3CYIG920@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 22:03:54 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <557C7AAB.2090609@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103914 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 11:47:07 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: v.schneidermann@gmail.com, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, > 20727@debbugs.gnu.org > I tried the 8 specific characters that you mentioned (the endpoints of the > ranges) with emacs -Q, and found that in my environment Symbola looked way > better with U+1F600, U+1F64F, U+1F100 (where older Emacs just displays hex codes > in boxes), that Symbola looks a bit worse with U+2E00 and U+20A0 (where older > Emacs uses FreeSerif which better matches the FreeSerif characters elsewhere in > the buffer) How did you get FreeSerif characters elsewhere in the buffer? Which characters were those? > both fonts look bad (hex boxes) with U+1F1FFF, U+2E7F, U+20CF (as > they're unassigned). Sorry, I mentioned the block limits without checking what parts are assigned. (Also, U+1F1FFF was a typo.) What do you see for U+2E3F and U+20BD? Anyway, does the idea of selectively removing codepoints from where we currently specify Symbola sound good, given these trials?