From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21953: Eliminate warnings in the emacs-25 release branch Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:51:11 +0200 Message-ID: <83mvu0vjww.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5656C3C1.2000806@easy-emacs.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448553140 19018 80.91.229.3 (26 Nov 2015 15:52:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, 21953@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 26 16:52:08 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a1yq6-0007B1-QW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:52:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51868 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1yq9-00058k-5b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:52:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38220) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1yq5-00058X-RI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:52:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1yq2-0001ZK-Li for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:52:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1yq2-0001ZG-J0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a1yq2-0006se-DL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21953 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21953-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21953.144855309026398 (code B ref 21953); Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2015 15:51:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54456 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a1ypV-0006ri-O5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:51:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:35082) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a1ypT-0006rZ-SZ for 21953@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 10:51:28 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NYF00100I43OK00@mtaout24.012.net.il> for 21953@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:44:15 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NYF002A3IDQQB00@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:44:15 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <5656C3C1.2000806@easy-emacs.de> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109291 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Röhler > Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:33:05 +0100 > Cc: John Wiegley > > As any change might create a new bug, IMO it's better to tackle this not > shortly before, rather after a release. Experience shows that things deferred toll "after the release" tend to remain unhandled. We still have a lot of time before the release, and didn't get anywhere close to a stable codebase, so there's nothing wrong in trying to fix some of the warnings now. TIA