From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22241: 25.0.50; etags Ruby parser problems Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 22:48:36 +0200 Message-ID: <83mvrw3tuj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86r3i9hnbt.fsf@yandex.ru> <83si1o45g1.fsf@gnu.org> <56A3C53D.1050408@yandex.ru> <83oacc3yx7.fsf@gnu.org> <56A3D47E.3030802@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453582163 12560 80.91.229.3 (23 Jan 2016 20:49:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22241@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 23 21:49:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aN57Q-0004Ug-1i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:49:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58532 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aN57P-0003Zn-Fs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 15:49:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44253) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aN57L-0003Zc-IK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 15:49:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aN57G-0007JK-QA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 15:49:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44371) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aN57G-0007JF-Mw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 15:49:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aN57G-0006t8-GC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 15:49:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22241 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22241-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22241.145358210826409 (code B ref 22241); Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22241) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2016 20:48:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60824 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aN56h-0006rt-QV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 15:48:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52916) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aN56g-0006re-TO for 22241@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 15:48:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aN56W-00076E-LI for 22241@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 15:48:21 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55954) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aN56W-000767-Hk; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 15:48:16 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3497 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aN56V-0006IX-QH; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 15:48:16 -0500 In-reply-to: <56A3D47E.3030802@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Sat, 23 Jan 2016 22:29:02 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:111899 Archived-At: > Cc: 22241@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 22:29:02 +0300 > > On 01/23/2016 09:59 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > So I guess I will leave constants out for now: etags has no notion of > > expressions. > > That would be a noticeable omission. Can't you just look for > > ^[ \t]([A-Z][a-z0-9_])[ \t]*=[ \t]* > > ? Then record the first group, and simply don't look at what's being > assigned. That's possible, but is it good enough? Does the above regexp necessarily mean it's a constant? > > Is the telltale part "<<" or "self" (or both)? If it's "<<", then are > > there other such tokens that "invalidate" a class? > > It's "class << self" as a whole. Instead of self, there could be a > variable, or a class name, but let's ignore those cases for now. > > If we see "class <<" - it's not a class definition. OK. Thanks for the other info, I will work on this.