From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20871: 25.0.50; fill-single-char-nobreak-p does not recognize a single-letter word when it is preceded by an open paren Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 20:01:11 +0300 Message-ID: <83mvobni94.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y4jchwog.fsf@mbork.pl> <87wpywhwa8.fsf@mbork.pl> <87shyku4jt.fsf@mbork.pl> <8337qkb7v7.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2jwtfkj.fsf@mbork.pl> <83r3e49o4g.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb33h6ux.fsf@mbork.pl> <83a8kfzff7.fsf@gnu.org> <87shy4vc9x.fsf@mbork.pl> <838tzvpcjb.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb2zth8r.fsf@mbork.pl> <837fffp8zt.fsf@gnu.org> <877fff3v7n.fsf@mbork.pl> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462035764 1083 80.91.229.3 (30 Apr 2016 17:02:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20871@debbugs.gnu.org To: Marcin Borkowski Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 30 19:02:33 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1awYHl-0007zR-Nq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:02:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59041 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awYHh-0003JZ-SI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:02:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50723) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awYHY-00035p-Rt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:02:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awYHN-0001R8-7h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:02:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awYHN-0001Pr-3y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:02:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awYHJ-00011I-NM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:02:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20871 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20871-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20871.14620356952678 (code B ref 20871); Sat, 30 Apr 2016 17:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20871) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Apr 2016 17:01:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58173 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awYGt-0000go-4J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:01:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59661) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awYGs-0000cQ-8W for 20871@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:01:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awYGd-0001Ek-Nw for 20871@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:01:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:32918) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awYGd-0001Dr-Km; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:01:19 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1924 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1awYGX-0007iq-JZ; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 13:01:14 -0400 In-reply-to: <877fff3v7n.fsf@mbork.pl> (message from Marcin Borkowski on Sat, 30 Apr 2016 18:41:32 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:117387 Archived-At: > From: Marcin Borkowski > Cc: 20871@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 18:41:32 +0200 > > >> (define-category ?l "Latin > >> Latin letters (including those with diacritics)") > > > > That doesn't sound right: why single out diacritics? And why only for > > Latin? > > Because I don't really know what this category is about? > > I think that my confusion is a sufficient proof that more precise > documentation is needed. I didn't object to expanding the doc string, I only suggested that we do it right. > > If we want to enhance those doc strings, each one of them should state > > what Unicode blocks are covered. (It would be okay to say something > > like "all Latin blocks", instead of enumerating them all, and > > similarly for the other categories.) > > A user might not know what exactly a "Unicode block" is. (I don't.) > I think a pointer to some sources or a few words of explanation are > really needed. A reference to the ELisp manual should do (the explanation should be added to the manual first, of course). > (I won't make a patch, though, since I clearly know too little about > it to do it correctly.) An opportunity to learn, I'd say. You could start with admin/unidata/Blocks.txt, for example. We use it to generate charscript.el (and categories are a semi-obsolete facility that predates char-script-table).