From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26986: 26.0.50; Unsafe recovery should be off by default in batch mode Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 22:49:46 +0300 Message-ID: <83mvaa3pyd.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495137078 26740 195.159.176.226 (18 May 2017 19:51:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 19:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 26986@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philipp Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 18 21:51:12 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dBRS0-0006eP-8C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 21:51:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55286 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBRS5-000816-TR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 15:51:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33621) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBRRz-00080z-Lk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 15:51:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBRRu-0004zL-QK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 15:51:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51168) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBRRu-0004zG-MP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 15:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dBRRu-0005C2-GN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 15:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 19:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26986 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26986-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26986.149513700519895 (code B ref 26986); Thu, 18 May 2017 19:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26986) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2017 19:50:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53845 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dBRQy-0005Ao-Mp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 15:50:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42374) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dBRQx-0005AE-BJ for 26986@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 15:50:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBRQn-0004Tp-7I for 26986@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 15:49:58 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBRQn-0004Tl-4W; Thu, 18 May 2017 15:49:53 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2765 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dBRQm-0004FH-Fe; Thu, 18 May 2017 15:49:52 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Philipp on Thu, 18 May 2017 21:44:22 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:132608 Archived-At: > From: Philipp > Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 21:44:22 +0200 > > In batch mode there will usually be no long-lived buffers with > non-recoverable contents, therefore the reasoning for > `attempt-stack-overflow-recovery' and > `attempt-orderly-shutdown-on-fatal-signal' being t doesn't apply. This > means that these variables should be nil by default in batch mode. I see your point, but what are the arguments for changing their values in batch mode? IOW, what advantages will this give us?