From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35163: 25.1; `narrow-to-region' docstring no mention of args Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 09:56:39 +0300 Message-ID: <83mukz7jko.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834l788mjc.fsf@gnu.org> <868swoffpi.fsf@zoho.eu> <87d0lwccwc.fsf_-_@gmail.com> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="104041"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: moasenwood@zoho.eu, 35163@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 09 08:57:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hDkgw-000QyF-UA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 08:57:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36479 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hDkgw-0002z6-0B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 02:57:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52119) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hDkgp-0002yf-PT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 02:57:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hDkgo-0007ih-Uq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 02:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36928) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hDkgo-0007gy-89 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 02:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hDkgo-0003sX-5j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 02:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 06:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35163 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35163-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35163.155479300914889 (code B ref 35163); Tue, 09 Apr 2019 06:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35163) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Apr 2019 06:56:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50472 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hDkga-0003s4-QF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 02:56:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37634) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hDkgZ-0003rt-Mv for 35163@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 02:56:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34358) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hDkgU-0007Zp-Bs; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 02:56:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3285 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hDkgT-0007Mr-Lq; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 02:56:42 -0400 In-reply-to: <87d0lwccwc.fsf_-_@gmail.com> (message from Noam Postavsky on Mon, 08 Apr 2019 19:09:39 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:157395 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 19:09:39 -0400 > Cc: , Emanuel Berg > > > Or at least a clear description of the problem. > > To be fair, message [11] is fairly clear and pretty close to what Glenn > wrote (perhaps it misses the emphasis on satisfying checkdoc). Obviously, it wasn't clear enough to me, or I wouldn't have asked the follow-up questions. When it became clear, I pushed a change within minutes. > Things unfortunately derailed after that. > > An 80+ line elisp riddle on a report about a docstring bug is surely a > sign something has gone horribly wrong... Indeed.