From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35624: log-view-diff regression Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 10:56:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83mujug2ty.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pnou2ak2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <051f40d7-206b-e5b5-f0b7-2354d0552dcf@yandex.ru> <874l64raeu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87imujju04.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <7a87f334-1d60-9d39-959c-97dbad690fc3@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="170821"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: juri@linkov.net, 35624@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 10 09:57:15 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hP0P0-000iG8-HF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 09:57:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38551 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP0Oz-000517-GS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 03:57:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54730) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP0Ot-00050z-3k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 03:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP0Os-00083e-91 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 03:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51717) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP0Os-00083W-66 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 03:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hP0Or-0002JX-QR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 03:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 07:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35624 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 35624-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35624.15574750008866 (code B ref 35624); Fri, 10 May 2019 07:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35624) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2019 07:56:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37028 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hP0OW-0002Iw-2M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 03:56:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40279) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hP0OU-0002Ii-LA for 35624@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 03:56:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57808) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP0OP-0007nW-0S; Fri, 10 May 2019 03:56:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1138 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hP0OO-000755-Fj; Fri, 10 May 2019 03:56:32 -0400 In-reply-to: <7a87f334-1d60-9d39-959c-97dbad690fc3@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 10 May 2019 03:14:34 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159023 Archived-At: > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 03:14:34 +0300 > Cc: 35624@debbugs.gnu.org > > On 09.05.2019 22:41, Juri Linkov wrote: > > > Since it's wrong in any case, better to revert it altogether in emacs-26. > > I kind of think that the feature the last change added is more valuable > than the regression (especially if the regression is only triggered when > a commit message is expanded). And I don't yet see any regression at all, so I'm definitely against reverting on the emacs-26 branch.