From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43519: 28.0.50; Overlay at end of minibuf hides minibuf's real content Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:33:46 +0300 Message-ID: <83mu1jxhyd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wo0p1twr.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1qx1q9v.fsf@gnu.org> <838sd425l2.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuvrxlho.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27977"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 43519@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 21 17:38:54 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kKNu1-0007Ae-Na for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 17:38:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35888 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKNu0-0001mr-Pr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:38:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39958) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKNpK-0007X9-JX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44317) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKNpK-0005v2-3t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKNpK-0006W8-1M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43519 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43519-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43519.160070243825036 (code B ref 43519); Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43519) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2020 15:33:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55862 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKNpF-0006Vk-Pq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:33:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33104) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKNpD-0006VV-0V for 43519@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:33:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59178) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKNp6-0005tT-CJ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:33:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3875 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kKNp2-00076b-Rg; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:33:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Gregory Heytings on Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:02:31 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:188608 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:02:31 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 43519@debbugs.gnu.org > > > For example: would it be okay to start the display at the > > beginning of the screen line where we end up after > > move_it_vertically_backward returns? > > IMO, no, this would not be okay, at least not for icomplete/ido/... In that case, what I propose will have exactly the same effect as setting window-start at BOB. So I don't understand why you say that this will not do. Stefan, what do you think about the above proposal?