From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44858: [PATCH] Make byte-compiler warn about wide docstrings Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:33:47 +0200 Message-ID: <83mtyk3ig4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zh34wfxo.fsf@gnus.org> <87v9dss2ic.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19561"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44858@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 11 08:35:46 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kncxu-0004yw-9Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 08:35:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60238 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kncxt-0001Yd-Ai for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 02:35:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33628) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kncxC-0001XE-Jl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 02:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56525) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kncxC-0000OP-Bn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 02:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kncxC-0003lU-8w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 02:35:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 07:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44858 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 44858-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44858.160767205214397 (code B ref 44858); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 07:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44858) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2020 07:34:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39835 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kncwO-0003k8-HR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 02:34:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40090) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kncwN-0003jx-NG for 44858@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 02:34:12 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57856) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kncwI-0008Qt-DH; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 02:34:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2680 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kncwH-0005Xz-Ex; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 02:34:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:59:16 -0600) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195722 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:59:16 -0600 > Cc: 44858@debbugs.gnu.org > > With these three patches applied, around 22 wide docstring warnings > remain in our tree for defvar's. I found it hard to fix them as I'm not > very familiar with the code in question, and I couldn't just simplify > the wording from the context. > > I'm assuming we don't want to push this without fixing those warnings, > so I would really appreciate some help with the remaining couple of > warnings. Please show those problematic doc strings, and I will try to fix them. Thanks.