From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45143: Incorrect markup in some doc/misc manuals Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:09:58 +0200 Message-ID: <83mtvttsc9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3y4kku7u8d.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <3pft2gpyn5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <0nmtw32qvz.fsf_-_@fencepost.gnu.org> <83r1l9w58u.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24438"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 45143@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 24 16:20:03 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lEvxG-00064z-Qi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:19:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34646 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEvxF-0006ud-RG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:19:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57772) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEvoc-0006KA-A9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEvoc-0005TE-1w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEvob-0006pj-U9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:11:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45143 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45143-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45143.161417942826227 (code B ref 45143); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45143) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2021 15:10:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35472 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEvo3-0006ox-RO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:10:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39788) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEvo2-0006ok-KF for 45143@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:10:27 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35186) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEvnx-0005Cn-FS for 45143@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:10:21 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2153 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lEvno-0004wc-5z; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:10:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Richard Stallman on Wed, 24 Feb 2021 01:49:29 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200719 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Cc: 45143@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 01:49:29 -0500 > > > I think this is because Org has some problems in supporting some of > > the key Texinfo markups, such as @kbd. > > You are surely right that that is why the problem exists, > but it still needs to be fixed. Of course, no argument here. My point is that until the Org's Texinfo export is fixed so that it produces better Texinfo, these problems will be inevitable. The issues described and discussed in that past thread were not fixed, AFAIK.