From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46911: 28.0.50; woman default page to open Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 16:48:39 +0200 Message-ID: <83mtvhy7ug.fsf@gnu.org> References: <7hpn0fdd32.fsf@dahud.boetes.org> <87a6rivg41.fsf@gnus.org> <8335xays0y.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6rhrahj.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7398"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 46911@debbugs.gnu.org, han@boetes.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 05 15:50:57 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lIBn6-0001mR-17 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 15:50:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50260 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIBn5-0004rl-2r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:50:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53822) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIBmE-00045Q-Ef for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50052) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIBmE-0007ns-6W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIBmE-0002lz-4p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 14:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46911 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 46911-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46911.161495574310589 (code B ref 46911); Fri, 05 Mar 2021 14:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Mar 2021 14:49:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33365 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIBlH-0002kj-0E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:49:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35780) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIBlF-0002kE-70 for 46911@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:49:01 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42563) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIBl8-0007LR-W2; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:48:55 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3835 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lIBl7-0000UW-RV; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:48:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87a6rhrahj.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 05 Mar 2021 14:33:28 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201547 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Glenn Morris , 46911@debbugs.gnu.org, han@boetes.org > Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 14:33:28 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> IMO there's no point maintaining woman.el, since it is a partial > >> re-implementation of a standalone program (man) that exists on every > >> Emacs platform of relevance (ie those that actually have man pages), > >> and which also has an Emacs interface. > > > > Yes, I think we already made that decision in the past. > > Should we obsolete woman.el then? If we're not maintaining it... If people no longer use it, I don't mind. However, in this discussion: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2020-07/msg00755.html Michael (CC'ed) wanted to consider woman.el for remote man pages. Michael, what happened with that idea?