From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47424: 28.0.50; enable-theme shows an empty list Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2021 16:44:20 +0300 Message-ID: <83mtuecggb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83czvaecf5.fsf@gnu.org> <83v992clv2.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6056"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 47424@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, mardani29@yahoo.es To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 04 15:45:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lT33u-0001TU-64 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 15:45:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43556 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lT33s-0008KJ-Tz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 09:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44064) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lT33m-0008Jy-Fp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 09:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51811) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lT33m-0000GA-81 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 09:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lT33m-0002RM-4W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 09:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2021 13:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47424 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47424-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47424.16175438759329 (code B ref 47424); Sun, 04 Apr 2021 13:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47424) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2021 13:44:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35124 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lT33K-0002QP-SP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 09:44:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50996) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lT33I-0002QC-Rz for 47424@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 09:44:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41031) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lT33D-0008P3-K2; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 09:44:27 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2899 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lT33C-00025Z-Uy; Sun, 04 Apr 2021 09:44:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Sun, 4 Apr 2021 08:17:04 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203547 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2021 08:17:04 -0500 > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 47424@debbugs.gnu.org, mardani29@yahoo.es > > To put this more concretely, I'd like to see two functions (and let's > disregard what we have now for the sake of argument): > > enable-theme > disable-theme > > Whatever happens technically (loading, autoloading, unloading, etc.) is > not interesting to the user. What is interesting is that after you run > one of the above commands the specified theme is either enabled or > disabled. This (a) turns the table on what we currently do, since currently load-theme can optionally enable the theme, while you propose to do it the other way around; (b) rocks the very delicate boat of how themes are enable, disabled, and prioritized and how they interact with face setup, so if we go that way, we should expect quite a rocky ride (suggested reading: custom.el). Is it really worth that?