From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50462: 27.2; emacsclient syntax highlight failure Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 23:17:16 +0300 Message-ID: <83mtomlt4j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sfygnsgv.fsf@gnu.org> <83o893obwy.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1dz7e24.fsf@gnus.org> <838s07o67b.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnnrknk9.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1dylvi6.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6772"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 50462@debbugs.gnu.org To: RDS Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 08 22:18:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mO41L-0001aS-Li for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 22:18:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37980 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mO41J-0001jJ-FB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 16:18:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36782) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mO41C-0001hi-NS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 16:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50332) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mO41C-000743-Fx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 16:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mO41C-0000WV-5t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 16:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 20:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50462 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50462-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50462.16311322331950 (code B ref 50462); Wed, 08 Sep 2021 20:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50462) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Sep 2021 20:17:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33644 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mO40P-0000VO-Dw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 16:17:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48842) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mO40L-0000V8-8N for 50462@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 16:17:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60928) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mO40G-0006Tm-2r; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 16:17:04 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3096 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mO40F-0001PJ-MI; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 16:17:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from RDS on Wed, 8 Sep 2021 13:05:59 -0700) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:213862 Archived-At: > From: RDS > Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 13:05:59 -0700 > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 50462@debbugs.gnu.org > > >OK, so please describe again, in as much detail as you can, what do > >you do with Emacs between correct display and incorrect display. You > >said you switch to another buffer and return, but could you tell more? > >Just switching to another buffer and back immediately triggers that? > >Or something else is needed? > That is indeed the tough part. I have yet to find a definite repeatable pattern that induces the bug. But, I now > usually arrive there in a few minutes of activity with two emacsclients -t in use. > > Switching back & forth immediately will not do it. At least one client is loading / unloading various files before > switching back to other client. Take a look again at the original post for more of these general actions I use. So two frames from two separate emacsclients are always involved? And you need to switch from one client to another and back?