From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#55869: [PATCH] Add support for the Lepcha script Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 13:00:23 +0300 Message-ID: <83mtejy0y0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83pmjfy2xk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2547"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 55869@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=A4=B8=E0=A4=AE=E0=A5=80=E0=A4=B0_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=A4=B8=E0=A4=BF=E0=A4=82=E0=A4=B9?= Sameer Singh Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 11 12:01:16 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nzxvg-0000Vd-2D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 12:01:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58994 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nzxve-0002gV-IC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 06:01:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40194) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nzxvS-0002gG-Q7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 06:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58001) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nzxvS-0001nz-AG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 06:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nzxvS-0006do-9m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 06:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 10:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55869 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 55869-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55869.165494163925475 (code B ref 55869); Sat, 11 Jun 2022 10:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 55869) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jun 2022 10:00:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51892 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nzxv5-0006cp-1w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 06:00:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55178) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nzxv2-0006cV-N8 for 55869@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 06:00:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52432) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nzxuw-0001g7-P4; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 06:00:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=5JQv1sD1gyrhyC8S/+b7uQgcqxqsqJF5YO5asKzklso=; b=GDFeNW+X50vzLzI1UONx C6QAu5ELks0ZSGuYFe59IA/QP5uy0HDXcG4qL4V0oSFKLh4zS7obUaRhvag7oYIrBM4OO6v6r4Rz5 3Zh5DClwjXwnpozQzJTp5OHvcjAaGB0ROnjHm5vloKeafTNCoIfJyAHlHPWV+rHsJxIWIXuhwKC7N 9/0BsQgAZbycFwQU2IJ4Wi5GYRqAs4+iCCh5T65ry29tLYro1hD7FZD+qSfchbf+2OrepHBWO6ENc tYyUJ6MUzJA+2pUBq7dxwhkFxV98LZQG46ggLfs0arT8fwWGSCrN48NxqJqtaaS+Hz/aopXVKn0nw mUq0VRlTkJAeaQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3926 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nzxuv-0007Bp-U8; Sat, 11 Jun 2022 06:00:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=A4=B8=E0=A4=AE=E0=A5=80=E0=A4=B0_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=A4=B8=E0=A4=BF=E0=A4=82=E0=A4=B9?= Sameer Singh on Sat, 11 Jun 2022 15:01:44 +0530) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:234259 Archived-At: > From: समीर सिंह Sameer Singh > Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 15:01:44 +0530 > Cc: 55869-done@debbugs.gnu.org > > >Can you tell where did you take this name of the script (or is it >the language)? Both Wikipedia and the > Omniglot pages show >names that look differently and are written with different >codepoints. > > I copied the name from the infobox in the Wikipedia page for the Lepcha script > (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lepcha_script) it says "Rong" which is one of the native name of the script, > one other name is "Rong Ring" which is written in the image of the Wikipedia infobox and also in the > omniglot website (https://omniglot.com/writing/lepcha.htm) both are correct. > (Atleast according to these websites) The question is: what should we use? Maybe using what is actually shown (as opposed to transliterated) is better?