From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56561: 29.0.50; Infloop in try_window Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 15:38:22 +0300 Message-ID: <83mtd9qlkx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874jzjwmhn.fsf@md5i.com> <878rovxqjo.fsf@md5i.com> <83sfn2sy19.fsf@gnu.org> <83lesusl4w.fsf@gnu.org> <87lesumqgf.fsf@yahoo.com> <83ilnysbc5.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsj2s8fg.fsf@gnu.org> <83cze6s7xt.fsf@gnu.org> <83bktqs724.fsf@gnu.org> <878rotlpck.fsf@yahoo.com> <834jzhsj1a.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8rxk3eb.fsf@yahoo.com> <83zgh9r2he.fsf@gnu.org> <87lestk18e.fsf@yahoo.com> <83y1wtqzqp.fsf@gnu.org> <87edyljvfs.fsf@yahoo.com> <83tu7hqvq1.fsf@gnu.org> <877d4djqhi.fsf@yahoo.com> <83pmi5qq8c.fsf@gnu.org> <87lestiadt.fsf@yahoo.com> <83o7xpqo1u.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsj1i6by.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2926"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mwd@md5i.com, 56561@debbugs.gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 16 14:39:14 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oCh4j-0000cq-3U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 14:39:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38342 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oCh4h-0004iH-BZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 08:39:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34932) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oCh4Y-0004hV-Pb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 08:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45460) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oCh4Y-0001AQ-GO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 08:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oCh4Y-0003kX-CE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 08:39:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 12:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56561 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56561-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56561.165797512014380 (code B ref 56561); Sat, 16 Jul 2022 12:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56561) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2022 12:38:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43219 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oCh4B-0003jr-Ja for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 08:38:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50236) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oCh49-0003jf-Kv for 56561@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 08:38:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57464) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oCh44-0000zx-D0; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 08:38:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=g41CsCyccguep53oUp6Xlk4E8sngFrO/WoAnH53FQ0w=; b=hqliQhOdgVHs g8uICxJm2EGS0CdNVsB8ORr6MbH3evSc6wB4yPAsv3xONp/PVQPCc5YYeZ3m60I/pHcK5kGlfAlXh clssoPl1hjRQMvo0zofWhFZ13AH34WoZx3/+JQz/3uGM8XuEIlmUpuOyImETKVUCVo2IsdrjGU+YF jcOxR3m9VxtK0vUBOlFYpFfoZTgRNndP17JGPexSoN0nudw3p3ckYCB7H9pNkd3A3whl1Z+I7Ya38 UrBS7J7220D6f+II/cqkPwi8CYSGDNgA3AftHxN4FIJj1Yh8kxKhbQ1dVS0Rv54JMf+9+TBnZZpMT QG5iQIRXtozNPLdSIZLPKQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2571 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oCh43-0002ns-T8; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 08:38:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87fsj1i6by.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Sat, 16 Jul 2022 20:34:57 +0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:237187 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: mwd@md5i.com, 56561@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 20:34:57 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> The problem is how to detect that the glyph matrix is indeed too small > >> to fit all of the tooltip text, and not too small due to the bug being > >> triggered? > > > Which bug? the one which started this discussion? that's the idea of > > looking at ends_at_zv_p flag of the rows in the matrix, after > > try_window returns. > > Yes. The question was how to tell apart the situation where the rows > don't extend to ZV because of that bug, and when they don't extend to ZV > legitimately (since the tooltip is too small.) By "legitimately", you mean because of the restrictions in x-max-tooltip-size? I guess we should compare the values of x-max-tooltip-size with their default values.