From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59347: 29.0.50; `:family` face setting ignored Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:27:18 +0200 Message-ID: <83mt8j15mx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83bkp4bfqf.fsf@gnu.org> <83wn7s9txp.fsf@gnu.org> <83pmdk9pat.fsf@gnu.org> <83cz9j9zyu.fsf@gnu.org> <838rk77yfo.fsf@gnu.org> <834juu9aya.fsf@gnu.org> <7cc9e03786024fc72f3b@heytings.org> <83a64l65ai.fsf@gnu.org> <7cc9e0378678a092e6ee@heytings.org> <835yf962q4.fsf@gnu.org> <7cc9e03786754c9e0aaf@heytings.org> <83zgcl4jra.fsf@gnu.org> <7cc9e03786c281cffdd4@heytings.org> <83tu2t4ie9.fsf@gnu.org> <7cc9e03786e324ff82ef@heytings.org> <83bkp04gjl.fsf@gnu.org> <83leo42vm9.fsf@gnu.org> <0d1ea3007fd94b7ae0b1@heytings.org> <0d1ea3007f2751b58d0e@heytings.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15277"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 59347@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 22 14:31:37 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oxTN9-0003iL-Tf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:31:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxTMi-0002s3-11; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:31:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxTMd-0002qr-9V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:31:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxTMc-0006Ep-Qs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oxTMc-0000md-Am for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59347 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59347-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59347.16691238392947 (code B ref 59347); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59347) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2022 13:30:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50215 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oxTMF-0000lT-BP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:30:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40080) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oxTMC-0000lF-US for 59347@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:30:38 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxTM4-00053g-QI; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:30:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=wnl97Djua2v6Ze54Esx973Pu+gLNXpet90fEjAgl2V8=; b=pE+JOcc7swmo shoOD1KQPglgxdRYTwQA9pFomPLT5ySU6HC3RXs3qDZMhsHNHVgx7HBf/7vkkBsQ+yjriXKM34zB5 mfkyvq7+fpkI3nZtpZjBcRhUjFYfBLzlQt1mG4j11JnKRmrfex+uKV/Ihe6DrL0bgYaKDsjf2TQcw b0y6LSzPcEWfLAkYE+ES1ulBOcS3nwEdkSnHkQYcNcEczTOyH5RzzDjerYrRUvAcnO1IVp46aCqw2 cJjTbqdArh0p293jamkUOMWlNcq6jV2OS2s16lJdFk/7rrO8jVZhJDzSFIiLKDt6BOrWqgRtQieiF USV18txELnaMevy7o90c5g==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxTIn-0001l4-7x; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 08:27:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <0d1ea3007f2751b58d0e@heytings.org> (message from Gregory Heytings on Tue, 22 Nov 2022 06:42:11 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:248635 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 06:42:11 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 59347@debbugs.gnu.org > > > I would go even further: scoring font candidates according to their > weight, slant, width and size (by comparing the values of these attributes > to the desired value of these attributes) is pointless unless the weight, > slant, width and size are set to nil (are not "free variables") when > building the list of fonts on which the scoring will be applied. You assume that all, say, 'bold' fonts have the same numerical weight values? That is factually incorrect, especially as some font backends support more fine-granular weight (and slant and width) classes and values than the scale we use (which AFAIR was inherited from an old standard). And please also consider my comment about the number of fonts we examine when looking for a suitable candidate.