From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11265: 24.0.94; gdb-mi very slow on Windows Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:00:40 +0300 Message-ID: <83lilt6klj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zkaaqo67.fsf@gnu.org> <87bompn6p6.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334768527 20765 80.91.229.3 (18 Apr 2012 17:02:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:02:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: karl-heinz@schneider-inet.de, 11265@debbugs.gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 18 19:02:04 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SKYGZ-0008NR-UF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:02:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44199 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKYGZ-0000bx-Dj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55256) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKYGP-0000bF-Hy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:02:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKYGK-000315-PN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:01:53 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39061) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKYGK-000310-Lq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:01:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKYGY-0008VC-47 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11265 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11265-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11265.133476848532640 (code B ref 11265); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11265) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Apr 2012 17:01:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40095 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKYFs-0008UG-Tg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:01:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:56205) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKYFn-0008Tw-Km for 11265@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:01:19 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M2O00600PUZ3700@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 11265@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:00:33 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.105.225]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M2O004T1PWVPYQ0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:00:32 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87bompn6p6.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59220 Archived-At: > From: Chong Yidong > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 11265@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:56:37 +0800 > > In addition to what Eli suggested, try setting bidi-paragraph-direction > to 'left in the *gud* buffer and see if it makes a difference in speed. I doubt that this could be related, since each time you type "continue" in the gud buffer, there's an empty line after the "Continuing" response. Anyway, I did a long debugging session, got to about 1000 lines in the gud buffer, but didn't see any perceptible slowdown. So the reason is still unclear.