From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16526: 24.3.50; scroll-conservatively & c-mode regression Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 22:16:48 +0200 Message-ID: <83lhxv6h5b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <52E3EAC2.2040100@gmx.at> <83lhy4as2l.fsf@gnu.org> <52E4019C.5080905@gmx.at> <83k3dnc3rl.fsf@gnu.org> <83iot7c3bq.fsf@gnu.org> <52E4EF61.3050404@gmx.at> <831tzubqxw.fsf@gnu.org> <20140126204310.GA3937@acm.acm> <20140129215240.GC3092@acm.acm> <83sis575lg.fsf@gnu.org> <20140131200001.GA3191@acm.acm> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391199438 29121 80.91.229.3 (31 Jan 2014 20:17:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 20:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16526@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 31 21:17:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W9KWe-0002gs-TZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 21:17:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57881 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9KWe-0006sM-3v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:17:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38418) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9KWW-0006qk-V8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:17:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9KWS-0002ei-5w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:17:12 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57684) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9KWN-0002d9-1t; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:17:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9KWL-0000Rn-Ti; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 20:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16526 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16526-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16526.13911994201709 (code B ref 16526); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 20:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16526) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2014 20:17:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43470 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9KWK-0000RU-9N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:17:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:52931) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9KWH-0000RK-KA for 16526@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:16:59 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0A00G008AM4C00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 16526@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 22:18:34 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N0A006H78EXH3B0@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 22:18:34 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <20140131200001.GA3191@acm.acm> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84372 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 20:00:01 +0000 > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, 16526@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Alan Mackenzie > > I think you commented somewhere that it would be a good idea to test on > such a build "any change which might affect redisplay". That might be > so, but how should one know which changes might do this? In your case, it's simple: any changes that affect font-lock, automatically affect redisplay, via JIT Lock. So I suggest always to do your testing of such changes in an unoptimized build. That is, when you finish development and start testing, do it in an unoptimized build. Thanks.