From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16676: 24.3.50; Repeated but random hang Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:56:55 +0200 Message-ID: <83lhxlx47c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83txcbxtg7.fsf@gnu.org> <87r47ecsy7.fsf@building.gnus.org> <834n4axa58.fsf@gnu.org> <8761opvr61.fsf@building.gnus.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391857094 13085 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2014 10:58:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 10:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , "Jan D." Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 08 11:58:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WC5c4-0004Qt-Uu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:58:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46091 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC5c4-0006Fs-KN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:58:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58812) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC5bu-00067G-MU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:58:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC5bn-0002kb-N4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:58:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42488) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC5bn-0002kX-K0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC5bm-0002ab-L1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:58:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16676 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16676-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16676.13918570439885 (code B ref 16676); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16676) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 10:57:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56502 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC5b5-0002ZB-Hp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:57:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:58351) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC5b0-0002Yw-7d for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:57:18 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0O00800BLRA300@mtaout24.012.net.il> for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:56:24 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N0O006XPBQ0EX20@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:56:24 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <8761opvr61.fsf@building.gnus.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84936 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 02:23:50 -0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Xlib obviously thinks otherwise, the error message in the backtrace is > > very clear. > > Well, might not something have scribbled something somewhere to make X > believe the window is no longer viable? I'm not an expert on this, so I don't know. Jan, can you comment, please?