From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16901: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:00:23 +0200 Message-ID: <83lhwstu1k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831tylvkq2.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393779671 23265 80.91.229.3 (2 Mar 2014 17:01:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 17:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16901@debbugs.gnu.org, dmantipov@yandex.ru To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 02 18:01:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WK9lN-00075J-Nv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 18:01:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36105 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WK9lN-0001O7-D2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 12:01:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WK9lD-0001Bv-Vp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 12:01:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WK9l9-0005Y3-3q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 12:01:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46904) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WK9l9-0005Xz-1W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 12:01:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WK9l8-0006Hu-Gf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 12:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 17:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16901 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 16901-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16901.139377964624148 (code B ref 16901); Sun, 02 Mar 2014 17:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16901) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2014 17:00:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48086 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WK9kr-0006HQ-SU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 12:00:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:38813) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WK9ko-0006HG-89 for 16901@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 12:00:43 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1T00L00IZJDB00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 16901@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:00:40 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1T00L5SJ94CH20@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:00:40 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86479 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 05:16:29 +0100 > Cc: Drew Adams , Dmitry Antipov , 16901@debbugs.gnu.org > > If you rebuild gmalloc.c with an added #define GC_MCHECK, do you see > the mabort calls too? Yes, I see them, and I'm looking into that. Which requires me to wade through some completely obfuscated code first...